While the author’s previous book on the matter, Exploring
the Illusion of Free Will, Second Edition, is a popular work, this brief
discourse is decidedly and robustly academic. It will doubtlessly prove
inaccessible to many physical and social science professors who are, as evident
by the profusion of elementally flawed free will defenses published by major
peer-reviewed journals, far more adept at learning, communicating and applying
concepts and principles than at understanding their fundamental nature.
The book focuses exclusively on the physical refutation of the free will
construct, concurrently addressing claims that because we are human, our
choices are somehow exempt from physical law. It also delves deeply into
quantum mechanical principles and phenomena relevant to the free will question,
siding with Einstein, Bohm, Hawking, Krauss and others regarding the causal
nature of both the macro and quantum world.
The refutations presented hopefully describe the physical evidence against free
will with sufficient strength and clarity to win over more hitherto agnostic
minds than have earlier attempts by other authors. The book’s original
contribution to the literature on human agency is that it not only challenges
recent published warnings of dangerous repercussions from abandoning belief in
free will, it presents a convincing argument for humanity evolving beyond a
notion of free choice that seems the catalyst for more harm than good. The
author presents evidence associating the psychological defense mechanism known
as “denial” with free will belief, and proposes that human autonomy’s correlate
of fundamental moral responsibility amplifies the widespread denial of the
existence and anthropogenic origin of a climate change crisis that, unless
successfully mitigated, many prominent scientists fear poses a serious threat
to the civilization we know.
The hard physical evidence prohibiting free will, and the arguments suggesting
a serious downside to maintaining the belief, will hopefully inspire a
long-overdue exploration of the implications of acknowledging that we live in a
world in which we, as humans, have fundamentally no control. Such an
investigation is clearly akin to our formulating a categorically new, and
distinctly evolved, understanding of who we are, and of what our essential
collective experience is, as a human species.